Dr. Jennifer Veilleux is a geographer and water scientist. This blog shares news, research, and fieldwork experiences from the Nile, Mekong, and Missouri river basins. She analyzes impacts development has on transboundary water resources and river communities.
Inga Dams on the Congo
River in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRoC) - 2 exist, a 3rd is planned
and then there is Grand Inga Dam - an ambitious project that makes engineers
drool because it will exceed the megawatt capacity of Three Gorges in China. It will also benefit Africa as a continent. The CNN article (thanks Joe!) below suggests that DRoC is actually going through with
negotiations to begin construction on Inga 3 in 2015. No tender yet, but you
know the Chinese are on it.
Inga dams are located on
a part of the Congo River that has something like 11% of all hydro potential in
Africa - maybe the world, I forget. There is a steep drop in the Inga Falls and
a rushing of water there that if harnessed, could electrify all of Africa! This is what is written in reports, and I don't know enough to deny it. Sounds really positive, like a dream for development needs on the continent. Low carbon output involved, harnessing the otherwise deemed useless rivers in Africa - thank you European colonialists for being so positive. And that DRoC is
stable enough to go ahead with this is hugely encouraging about what is
happening in many African countries. The Ethiopians are calling it a
Renaissance. I would like to agree.
There are some
obstacles. The electricity grid in DRoC has been stripped of copper, so there
would need to be big-time investment in the grid to carry the electricity out
of Congo. Electricity is lost over distance unless there are additional pieces
of infrastructure to handle the transformation of the energy over space. More
investment. With Chinese companies now in the game of providing such hardware,
this is more than a pipe dream, but will require some time. There are some
folks living in the area that will have to go if the project is approved and
moves forward. But from what I remember researching on this more than 5 years
ago - the population is very small of permanent residents, but still this is
something to consider. And who lives downstream? Always the question of who
matters and why...
I also remember looking
at the engineering plans. The dam would be built in a diversion - the water is
already diverted north of the falls through Inga Dams 1 & 2. They aren't at
full operating capacity for many technical reasons, though a Canadian mining
firm invested in some dredging activity on one of the dams some years ago. The
electricity currently generated goes to two places, I believe. Kinshasa, for
domestic use, and to mining operations, mostly foreign owned.
What has stopped Inga in
the past? The original dams were commissioned in 1970s and 80s if I remember
correctly. Since then there has been massive political instability in DRoC,
including the little talked about wars that took more than $5 million lives (on
estimate). Digression: this period is sometimes called World War III or the
African World War - because of the comparison in lives lost and nations involved.
There was a point where rebels controlled Inga dams to get demands met in
Here is to hoping that
this announcement in Paris signals a turning point in DRoC's internal affairs.
I think DRoC still has one of the world's highest reported rape incidents per
capita, per minute. But, the World Bank is making positive comments about the economic
potential linked with quality of life improvements - it's got to be valid - and my sarcasm aside - it is undeniable that
if DRoC and neighboring countries all the way down to South Africa can connect
up to huge amounts of electricity from the Inga Project seeing it's full design (to include Inga's 3 and Grand), as well as get the existing dams working up to full capacity again, and extending the electricity grid toward different destinations, this will change the face of the continent.
So many people have high hopes for Inga Dams in the near future.
Will 'world's biggest' hydro power project light up Africa?
By Teo Kermeliotis, for CNN
June 28, 2013 -- Updated 1126 GMT (1926 HKT)
The government of the DRC is seeking to harness the power potential of the Congo river by building Grand Inga, expected to be the world's biggest hydroelectric project when completed.
Harnessing the mighty Congo
DR Congo moving ahead with plans to build the world's biggest hydroelectric project
When complete, Grand Inga could have a massive capacity of 40,000 megawatts
Project construction will begin in October 2015
But critics argue that the project will only serve the mining firms and not benefit the rural poor
(CNN) -- The world will have seen nothing like it.
It is being hailed as the holy grail for power, the biggest hydroelectric project ever built that would harness sub-Saharan Africa's greatest river and light up half of the continent.
But will the ambitious plan to tame the mighty Congo River, a mega-project first conceived in the 1970s, finally get going and what will be its actual impact?
Last month, the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo announced in Paris that the construction of the first phase of a new set of energy projects at the country's Inga Falls would begin in October 2015. The new $12 billion development, dubbed Inga 3, is expected to have a power output of nearly 4,800 megawatts (MW), with South Africa agreeing to buy half of the electricity generated.
Grand Inga site. Click to expand
But the DRC government's bold vision ultimately involves five further stages that would complete the "Grand Inga" mega-project, giving it an astonishing capacity of 40,000 MW -- that's twice as much as the Three Gorges dam in China, currently the world's largest hydro project.
When completed, Grand Inga could provide more than 500 million people with renewable energy, say its proponents.
"A myth dreamed of for 40 years, Grand Inga is becoming a reality with an action plan spread over several plants which will be added in stages," the DRC government said in a statement after the Paris meeting.
With a length of 4,700 kilometers, the Congo is Africa's second biggest river, after the Nile, and the world's second largest river in terms of flow, after the Amazon. At the Grand Inga site, some 1.5 million cubic feet of water flow steadily through a network of cataracts every second, dropping about 100 meters to form the world's biggest waterfall by volume.
Ethiopia builds infrastructure for growth
Zambia's investment in infrastructure
Yet the power potential from the river's rapids has largely gone unexploited in a country plagued by violence and corruption for decades -- just 11.1% of the DRC's population has access to electricity, according to the World Bank.
So far, the only two projects built to tap Congo's potential are two smaller dams -- Inga 1, commissioned in 1972, and Inga 2, a decade later. Both of them are almost exclusively used to provide energy for the mining companies in the southern DRC's copper belt but are currently undergoing extensive rehabilitation as they perform far below capacity.
The DRC government hasn't yet decided on the developer of Inga 3, but three consortia from China, Spain and Korea/Canada are the frontrunners in the competitive selection process. The financing will come from both public and private sources: the Africa Development Bank, the World Bank, the French Development Agency, the European Investment Bank and the Development Bank of Southern Africa have all been named as potential contributors.
But will the DRC, a country with a risky investor profile, be able to raise enough money to build the mammoth project? Some say that with $12 billion required just for Inga 3 -- the entire project has an estimated cost of $80 billion -- it's going to be an extremely tough and complex task to find the huge sums needed.
It almost defies imagination that this kind of money is going to be available. James Leigland
"It almost defies imagination that this kind of money is going to be available," says James Leigland, technical adviser to the Private Infrastructure Development Group. He notes that several different players will "have to come to the party with equity," from multilaterals, commercial and national development banks to the DRC government and the developer of the project.
"It is hard to imagine how all of this is going to fall into place," says Leigland. "They've started, they've made a commitment to proceed on the basis that South Africa will take a huge amount of the power, but getting from here to there it's just a very long road," he adds.
Indeed, the pledge by energy-hungry South Africa to purchase about half of Inga 3's future power production is essential for the project to attract finance and get going.
The two countries are currently negotiating a treaty to finalize the details of a power purchasing agreement, including the construction of transmission lines to transfer 2,500 MW of Inga 3's production to South Africa. The exact routing of the energy corridor is not yet defined, but it is expected to be over land, through different countries in the southern part of the continent.
A World Bank spokesperson told CNN that such power exports could potentially raise considerable revenues for the DRC. "With energy resources on this scale, DRC can play a pivotal role in meeting not only its future domestic energy needs for poverty reduction and economic development, but also the energy needs at regional and continental levels," said the spokesperson.
Development of projects like Inga 3 and subsequent Grand Inga is essential for growth, more jobs and improved well-being in Africa. World Bank spokesperson
"With only one in 10 Congolese households having access to electricity, development of projects like Inga 3 and subsequent Grand Inga is essential for growth, more jobs and improved well-being in Africa."
Power to the people?
Yet, not everyone agrees. With half of Inga 3's power traveling south, and nearly all of Inga 1 and 2's energy bypassing the DRC's rural communities to be consumed by the mining industry, critics say the country's poor will see no benefits from the project.
"All the electricity that will be generated from Inga 3 is for commercial purposes and nothing is going to supply the communities," says Rudo Sanyanga of International Rivers, an NGO working against destructive riverside projects.
"The assumption being promoted is that by developing Grand Inga and exporting, or supplying the mines, will then create jobs in the mining industry and it will trickle down to the community -- but it has never worked," adds Sanyanga.
Instead of pouring billions into mega-schemes, the group argues there are less costly and more effective solutions that can be deployed to tackle the continent's energy poverty, especially wind, solar and micro hydropower projects.
"They should prioritize decentralized energy and have a combination of grid and off-grid planning," says Sanyanga. "If they really want to get electricity to the people, not only in the rural areas but as well as in the cities, they have to have another plan which is cheaper than grid development."